If you think it's wonderful that kids
keep getting massacred in schools, raise your hand.
Didn't raise it, did you? That means
we've just agreed there's a problem.
We haven't agreed on what to do.
It's not purely a gun problem. Some
mix of pain, insecurity, lovelessness, hopelessness, anger, feeling
left out, and too much TV (or video games) leaves a dangerous
minority of our young people itching to shoot up a school and be
famous for a day. (Other than Charles Alan Whitman, who shot up a
college decades ago, I can't remember the name of a single idiot
who's done that.)
But it ain't purely a people problem,
either. The ready availability of guns helps make shootings,
accidental or otherwise, the third leading cause of death among
children. Ready availability of modern weapons of war contributes to
school shootings. The NRA (like purveyors of stuff that pollutes our
environment, induces cancer, or causes obesity or drug-dependency)
muscles up with money and misinformation to avoid meaningful
regulation or responsibility.
Some say it's a mental illness problem
– or that it's because we took prayer out of the schools, or don't
spank kids any more. Increasing mental health and kids' values would
help. But assume putting religion in schools would work. (whose
religion? all of them? and which hasn't involved violence?) If it
somehow discouraged young folks from massacring fellow students,
you'd affect the problem in ten or fifteen years, when 19 year-olds
would have experienced religion in schools since kindergarten. What
do we do in the meantime?
Watching the anger at Monday's City
Council meeting, I wished again that more people who know a lot about
guns would help craft steps that could decrease deaths without unduly
burdening responsible citizens. Although gun enthusiasts were angry,
they seemed less angry and threatening than a similar group two years
ago. When Mayor Miyagashima noticed that, and started asking if they
thought background checks were a good step, instead of laughing or
shouting they quietly said, “Yes. Sure.” I sensed that though
they're still loyal to the NRA line, the continued bloodiness of
schools is softening more folks' resistance to attempting a few
sensible steps.
The NRA has its fans worked up that
they'll lose their guns. Ain't gonna happen. Even if, politically,
you could ban guns, it wouldn't work. It's too late. And the Second
Amendment ain't going anywhere. In fact, the NRA's course –
absolute opposition to anything that might decrease the bleeding but
impair profits – is the only way imaginable that we'd eliminate the
Second Amendment. A vast majority want gun-control. Only more and
more shootings, with more and more NRA indifference and bluster,
could conceivably make that vast majority so sick of guns it might
try to amend the Constitution.
It's a complex problem. Slogans and
simple fixes won't work. Both sides say we should do what some other
countries do; but we've a unique mix of ethnic diversity, open spaces
and huge cities, and gun-related traditions. And constitutions
protecting gun ownership.
The City Council is right to express
concern. Those who brought guns to the council meeting shot
themselves in the foot: they merely reminded others how easily a
demented fool with a gun could kill scores of people. If I were a
counselor, intimidation tactics would encourage me to vote against
the would-be intimidators.
How about both sides bending a little
to seek reasonable steps?
-30-
[The above column appeared this morning, Sunday, 23March 2018, in the Las Cruces Sun-News, as well as on the newspaper's website and on KRWG's website. During the week, a spoken version will air on KRWG (probably Wednesday morning and evening and again on Saturday) and KTAL, 101.5 FM, on Thursday.]
[By the way, we're going to have a two-hour radio discussion of these issues on KTAL 101.5 FM (which you can also stream at www.lccommunityradio.org) on Wednesday, 11 April, 8-10 a.m. on "Speak Up, Las Cruces!" with a real mix of viewpoints, including several gun owners of various political persuasions -- e.g. Lucas Herndon, a gun enthusiast whose politics are generally Progressive, Harvey Daiho Hilbert, a gun enthusiast who's also a Buddhist roshi, and Bev Courtney (a gun instructor and Tea Party stalwart) and William Webb (also very conservative), plus (briefly) Bill McCamley, Greg Smith, and others. Haven't figured out just who'll speak when or how it will all work, but we'll have a mix of strong opinions, so it should be interesting. I hope and believe these are people who won't just toss slogans back and forth at each other like snowballs.]
[I should probably mention that on KTAL, 101.5 FM, the Sunday Show -- this morning at 9 -- will replay our interview with Frank Zamora, former Baptist minister and current professor of philosophy and religion, and that from 8-10 a.m.this Wednesday morning "Speak Up, Las Cruces!", on 101.5 FM, will feature:
8-9 Algernon D'Amassa, journalist, actor, theatre director, Buddhist teacher, and friend, with a break at 8:30 to talk about Dona Ana County with its PIO, Jess Williams.
9-10:
first 40-45 minutes: Brandon Gass, whose six-minute film will play at the famous Cannes Film Festival this year, along with his leading lady, and then for the last 15-20 minutes, Kevin Bixby concerning the lawsuit against the Border Wall, possible further protests at that site, and other environmental matters.]
You can also stream KTAL, Las Cruces's Community Radio Station, at www.lccommunityradio.org