A Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC)
could help improve the Doña
Ana County Detention Center.
This proposal is independent of any
criticisms I may have of the jail administration. It's based on
successful models as diverse as Canada and New Mexico's own San
Miguel County.
The Canadian CAC system, initiated in
1965, began to function as a national organization after the 1977
MacGuigan Report, which was sparked by several serious prison
disturbances. The Canadian Government believed that the disturbances
showed the need for community representatives who could monitor and
evaluate correctional policies and procedures. As the Report noted,
“correctional agencies traditionally operated in isolation” and
“the public had never been well informed about corrections or the
criminal justice system.” Both observations accurately describe
our jail.
The Canadians saw that properly
structured CAC's could both inform the public about prison realities
and advise the Canadian Correctional Service (CSC) of its own
shortcomings. For nearly forty years the CSC and the CAC's have been
refining their relationship.
In the successful Canadian program,
CAC's have three main roles: as advisors,
impartial observers, and liasons.
As advisors they provide
impartial advice from a cross-section of community members concerning
operations. Their suggestions are based on regular meetings with
offenders, local union representatives, and local detention center
management.
They observe during both day-to-day
operations and institutional crises, so as to assist detention center
officials in evaluating and monitoring how well the detention center
fulfills its missions in accordance with laws and policies. They
also help demonstrate – to the public, to employees, and to
incarcerated persons – the detention center's commitment to
openness, integrity, and accountability.
As liaisons,
they provide management a community perspective, help tell the jail's
story to the public, and encourage additional public understanding of
and participation in the correctional process.
In Las Vegas the CAC has some definite
accomplishments to report. Construction on a “re-integration
center” right near the jail is nearly complete. Maybe we couldn't
replicate that here; but I lunched Tuesday with a fellow whose felony
conviction as a teenager has made it difficult for decades to get
back into the work force.
Warden Patrick Snedeker, who went to
NMSU back around when I did, speaks highly of the CAC for just the
reasons the Canadians do. (Caveat: Las Vegas is a much smaller town
with a smaller jail at 50% capacity, and is (enviably) focused on
rehabilitation.)
“We've been very successful with the
CAC,” Snedeker told me recently. “The CAC can help with things
as diverse as legislative funding, getting information to
decision-makers such as the County Commission, and identifying
resources within the community. It also helps the community
understand our purpose and our plans.”
“We absolutely try to focus on
rehabilitation, whether through grant funding or partnerships with
other entities.”
“Our three major concerns are
violence, substance abuse, and recidivism.”
The need for an independent CAC is
more urgent here than in Las Vegas. We have a much bigger jail,
setting a much harder set of tasks for our jailers, including Mr.
Barela.
At least here, things happen that
either don't reach Mr. Barela or reach him but not the public or the
County Commission. The name Slevin should ring some bells; and I'm
aware of a few more recent situations that could lead to huge
verdicts if prisoners sued. And I don't even spend much time at the
jail. Most of the problems are avoidable.
Again, Mr. Barela has a huge,
difficult task. Even without the current investigation, he – or
anyone in his position – could use the help of a CAC. Let's get
one going.
-30-
[The above column appeared in the Las Cruces Sun-News this morning, Sunday, 4 October 2015. For further information on Canadian CAC's, click here.] The site also has links to recent annual reports by the national CAC.]
Good column, Peter! Question: theoretically, why is it that a "re-integration center" could not be realized in Dona Ana County?
ReplyDeleteDidn't mean to say that it can't be done here. Rather, I was trying to recognize it's likely to be more difficult and complex here for a number of reasons, among them the greater size (and possibly greater diversity) of the prison population here. It would be a worthy goal here too.
ReplyDeleteGood morning sir,
DeleteMy name is Patrick Hayes and I work for KFOX14. Any chance you can send me your contact info. I'm trying to get in touch with you about a story I'm working on.
My email is phayes.az@gmail.com.