Help save us all money!
El Paso Electric (EPE) wants a
humongous rate increase: initially $8.6 million, dropped to $6.4
million.
Recently, a hearing examiner's
proposed decision (PD) recommended giving EPE about one-tenth of
that, $640,000.
That was good. Credit intervenors,
including U.S. Congressional candidate Merrie Lee Soules, One-Hour
Air-Conditioning, and our City, County, and Attorney-General.
But the PD, apparently a huge victory
for customers, would actually be a devastating and expensive loss if
allowed to stand!
The relatively “small” overall
increase is actually a huge increase to residential customers and a
decrease for some large customers. Worse, most of the
residential increase is to a “customer charge” that even the
smallest customers pay, regardless of usage. Our poorest citizens
get hit hardest.
Part of the reason we get hosed, and
big companies get a decrease, is that they have a Time of Use rate
and we don't. EPE determines rates mainly based on customers' “peak
usage”; but while big customers can cut back to save on peak, EPE
discourages residential customers from decreasing their peak-time
usage. EPE doesn't give them a clear signal that shifting usage will
save money.
Each of us needs to write or call the
PRC seeking “Customer Choice.”
Intervenors have proposed a wholly
voluntary Customer Choice pilot program limited to 4% of EPE's
customers. Customers could use less energy at peak times and save
money, the way large users can. Demonstrating that we could adjust
our usage would help both our wallets and our environment.
Why would EPE oppose Customer Choice?
Because if EPE can keep “peak usage” very high, it can sell the
PRC on the idea that EPE needs to build additional huge (and
wasteful) power plants so as to be able to supply the “peak usage”
needed on the highest-usage day of the year. If usage gets evened
out more, there's no such excuse.
We're talking big money: EPE says it
will build $1.1 billion in new assets over the next five years,
possibly raising rates 40% – all to hit the “peak usage” need
that doesn't have to occur! We're also talking urgency: EPE will
file its next rate increase in early 2017.
Only by implementing the Customer
Choice pilot program NOW can we help stave off this madness, by
showing that many customers, if allowed, will choose to save money by
washing and drying their clothes at a non-peak usage times. If we
can't implement it now, we can't demonstrate that it works in time to
forestall huge capital expenditures by EPE for unnecessary new power
plants that we'll be paying for for decades.
It's a mystery why the hearing
examiner proposes to deny us Customer Choice. The pilot program
would be a small, sensible effort to gather accurate information.
EPE might not want accurate information that could show its
additional power plants would be a waste of money; but why should the
hearing examiner or the PRC – our employees – oppose it?
The PD claimed that there wasn't
sufficient detail in the record; but Intervenors supplied huge boxes
of data, including four years' worth of analysis, extensive data, and
a detailed rate schedule!
The County Commission – led by
Chairman Wayne Hancock and Billy Garrett – gave county attorneys
clear orders to fight this; the City is doing the same. Please add
your voice to the chorus!
My blog post today has further
information and the Commission's address; but at least email and call
Commissioner Sandy Jones at (505) 827-4531 / Sandy.Jones@state.nm.us.
Ask that we be allowed to show what we
can do. We need Customer Choice.
-30-
[The column above appeared in the Las Cruces Sun-News this morning, Sunday, 28 February, and will appear later on the KRWG-TV website. You may comment directly on this blog-post, on www.lcsun-news.com by clicking on Opinion and looking for this column, which will be under a different headline;, or by clicking on News then Local Viewpoints on the KRWG site. I welcome comments, questions, and criticism.]
Please write:
Public Regulation Commission
1120 Paseo de Peralta
PERA Building
P.O. Box 1269
Santa Fe, NM 87504
Please call or email :
Karen L. Montoya (505) 827-8015 KarenL.Montoya@state.nm.us
Patrick Lyons (505) 827-4531 Patrick.Lyons@state.nm.us
Valerie Espinoza (505) 827-4533 Valerie.Espinoza@state.nm.us
Lynda Lovejoy (505) 827-8019 Lynda.Lovejoy@state.nm.us
Sandy.Jones (505) 827-8020 Sandy.Jones@state.nm.us
Tell them "Customer Choice" makes sense for EPE's customers -- and for the environment -- and that it's only fair!
Mr. Jones is "our" Commissioner. I'd suggested calling him, if you just call one; and if you send an email, direct it to him but "cc" the others.
[You might also "cc" County Commission Chairman Wayne Hancock and/or Mayor Miyagashima, to express support for their interventions, which helped decrease the rate increase 93% from what EPE filed for.]
[But the PD retains or even strengthens the unfairness of EPE's rates. And I can only tell you that the closer you look, the worse EPE's conduct here smells!]
Please write:
Public Regulation Commission
1120 Paseo de Peralta
PERA Building
P.O. Box 1269
Santa Fe, NM 87504
Please call or email :
Karen L. Montoya (505) 827-8015 KarenL.Montoya@state.nm.us
Patrick Lyons (505) 827-4531 Patrick.Lyons@state.nm.us
Valerie Espinoza (505) 827-4533 Valerie.Espinoza@state.nm.us
Lynda Lovejoy (505) 827-8019 Lynda.Lovejoy@state.nm.us
Sandy.Jones (505) 827-8020 Sandy.Jones@state.nm.us
Tell them "Customer Choice" makes sense for EPE's customers -- and for the environment -- and that it's only fair!
Mr. Jones is "our" Commissioner. I'd suggested calling him, if you just call one; and if you send an email, direct it to him but "cc" the others.
[You might also "cc" County Commission Chairman Wayne Hancock and/or Mayor Miyagashima, to express support for their interventions, which helped decrease the rate increase 93% from what EPE filed for.]
[But the PD retains or even strengthens the unfairness of EPE's rates. And I can only tell you that the closer you look, the worse EPE's conduct here smells!]