Tuesday was eventful for local
governments here.
The Doña
Ana County Commission announced a four-year contract with Fernando
Macias to be the new county manager.
Then
moderate to progressive candidates swept the city elections.
Gabe
Vasquez got 70% of the vote in District 3; Yvonne Flores got a
surprising 57% in District 6, beating incumbent Ceil Levatino; and
District 5 incumbent Gill Sorg got 51% in a three-way race.
Meanwhile Joy Goldbaum, the most progressive candidate in the
Municipal Judge II race, got 51% against incumbent Kent Yalkut (29%)
and Nelson Goodin (21%).
These
results reflect both relative contentment with the City Council's
present course and strong discontent with the national political
situation.
The
Council has been generally progressive. Voters, knowing that,
re-elected Sorg, booted Levatino (the most frequent dissenting vote),
and added Vasquez, who was endorsed by retiring District 3 councilor
Olga Pedroza.
Businesses
have voiced complaints in the past about permit processes and the
like. The council and new City Manager Stuart Ed have taken steps to
address such complaints. I hope those efforts continue. (Vasquez's
business editor and Hispanic Chamber experience may prove useful.)
Business is an important aspect of our community. It shouldn't
dominate city politics, as it once did; but it deserves respect and
fair treatment. Entrepreneurship deserves even more.
The
results were clearly a victory for shoe-leather. Progressive
candidates and their supporters did a lot of canvassing. “We
touched every door in the district, some of them three times,” one
campaign manager said Friday. But there seemed to be a lot more
newspaper and radio ads for Levatino and Montañez.
Goldbaum walked a lot, and many people walked for her; but incumbent
Yalkut bought many more (and much bigger) signs and newspaper ads.
(Goodin spent nothing! Governor Martinez may well appoint him
district judge, replacing Macias. He'd face another election next
November.)
Some
of the energy moving those shoes along our streets was generated by
Donald Trump. His election, and his absurd and dangerous
post-election conduct, awakened many people who can't do much about
him but can try to keep local government sane, sensible, and caring.
In Virginia, Washington State, and elsewhere, distaste for Trump
fueled Democratic wins.
Some
motivation was purely local. Many of Levatino's constituents were
angry. That, plus the strong effort by and for Flores, turned a
swing district strongly progressive. Voters know and respect Sorg, a
decent man who really cares about water and quality-of-life issues,
while Steve Montañez didn't inspire widespread affection.
Vasquez's extremly strong qualifications and Bev Courtney's extreme
politics and limited knowledge and experience made the District 3
race a mismatch. Gabe – just an outstanding candidate – had many
more people walking the streets for him. He also had more money than
Courtney, who didn't receive nearly as much funding from conservative
and business interests as Levatino and Montañez.
Meanwhile
Macias is a promising choice as county manager – a post he's held
before. (He was student body president when I was still around
campus in the 1970's.) I liked what I saw of him as judge. Other
judges weren't so keen, and replaced him as Presiding Judge in the
Third Judicial District; but he certainly has the tools and the
perspective to excel in his new post – and the four-year contract
he wisely negotiated should help.
Congratulations
to everyone who worked so hard, and hats off to all the winning and
losing candidates.
-30-
[The foregoing column appeared this morning, Sunday, 12 November 2017, in the Las Cruces Sun-News, and on the newspaper's website and KRWG's website, and a spoken version will air a few times during the week on KRWG (Wednesday and probably Saturday) and KTAL (Thursday).]
[A Sun-News story carried comments on the "small" increase in turnout from eight to 11 per cent of eligible voters. While that increase may have disappointed Scott Krahling and Delores Connor and others involved in trying to increase voter turnout here, a jump from eight to 11% is actually a 37.5% increase. In any case, no one should use the voter turnout as an excuse to denigrate the city, the results, or the winners. A lot of people just don't care. Many who follow national elections really don't care much who runs the city or the county. That's their right. (As a young man here, I didn't have a clue who was on the county or city commission -- until suddenly I was hired as a local reporter for the El Paso Times.) Everyone who wanted to vote in this election, or run in this election, or speak up for or against candidates had abundant opportunities to do so. The races came out as they did. The low turnout means little; and if it means anything at all, it means that the vast silent body of citizens obviously isn't desperately unhappy with the city government's direction. At the same time, while Gill Sorg's win over Steve Montañez looks like a rout when you say 51% to 41%, a difference of 121 votes doesn't sound huge, and progressives shouldn't rest on their laurels.]
[i have a couple more random observations:
1. Ceil Levatino will be missed. As I've said elsewhere, I'd have voted for Yvonne Flores. And I know Ms. Levatino irritated some constituents. On the other hand, my interactions with her were always quite pleasant; and a couple of the councilors who served with her, but generally disagreed with her, both say she was always been courteous and respectful in their conversations, and that they'll miss her. She deserves credit for that, and for taking her work as councilor seriously.
2. It'll be interesting to watch Monday evening's city council discussion of when the cost-of-living increase in the minimum wage should kick in. Appears councilors or staff made a mistake in hastily [and wrongfully, under the City Charter] rewriting the ordinance from the original petition-induced version. A legal purist might be inclined to go back to the CAFe version for guidance. On the other hand, after an election that removed the council's most conservative councilor, I'd be tempted to vote to delay the increase to show concerned small-business owners some concern. The issue also reminds one of another important and as-yet-unaddressed issue, changing the charter provisions regarding ordinance petitions and possibly recall provisions. (Not to eliminate either, but to bring the ordinance provision into line with what was intended and perhaps make the recall provision more like the statewide provision.) Hope we'll see action on that early in the new year.
3. "Que Tal Community Radio" [KTAL-LP 101.5 FM] now has live streaming. That's of general interest, because some folks can't get it so well and a few friends and readers are far away. I should also note that by some accident I'll be on both at 9 a.m. and at 10 a.m. [New Mexico time] this morning, with my regular Sunday Show at 9 [discussing religions and the arguments against them with secular humanist Dr. Richard Hempstead] and at 10 a.m. [getting interviewed by Sandhi Scott on her show. The Hempstead discussion is interesting. On Sandhi's show, I'm sure she'll do her usual good job, but she's stuck with a somewhat dull interviewee, so no promises!]
4. Saw Macias's predecessor, Julia Brown, Saturday morning at Senator Martin Heinrich's "Coffee Talk" event at Salud. Reminds me to note that although she seems to have been too-hastily fired and probably for the wrong reasons, about which we may learn more in a court trial, But Macias seems a solid choice -- though Interim County Manager Chuck McMahon, whom we saw last night at the opening of Four Corners Gallery, gave him tough competition for the "permanent" job.
A tough night for Conservatives indeed. Looking forward to being back in LC.
ReplyDelete