Sunday, September 8, 2019

County Administration and County Elected Officials

The Doña Ana County Commission needs to schedule a work session with other elected officials – Sheriff, Clerk, Treasurer, and Assessor – concerning a key problem.

A city's comptroller and police chief aren't elected. The U.S. President appoints the FBI Director and U.S. Treasurer, with the Senate's “advice and consent.” If you and I were assigned to create an effective local government, we'd likely not fill so many positions through elections.

Elected county officials are a vestige of New Mexico history, for better or worse. That creates problems; and problems, like carpets, need to be aired out now and then. Beaten with a broom, maybe. Neither averting one's eyes nor manipulating the ambiguities to grab power is helpful.

There are grey areas regarding how county manager and elected officials work together. Voters elect a clerk or treasurer or sheriff based on his or her reputation and ideas; each enters office intent on doing a good job; but in certain areas – notably human resources, purchasing, and the legal – the elected official's power and discretion is limited. That naturally creates conflicts.

How we view those conflicts can depend on the elected official. Some who supported Kim Stewart's request for a big raise for Undersheriff Jaime Quesada would have lost their breakfasts on the commission-chamber carpet if Kiki Vigil had obtained commission approval of a similar raise for Undersheriff Ken Roberts. Kiki objected violently to county interference with his personnel decisions; but what sane observer wasn't relieved that the County managed to sack Sheriff Todd Garrison's pal, Rick Seeberger. (Full disclosure: Seeberger sued everyone in sight, including me; the U.S. District Court eventually took his money, not defendants'.)

Some of what goes on would be comical if it didn't waste our money and our county government's energy. The County needs to avoid paying gobs of our money to unqualified cronies of elected officials; but maybe when officials need to retain a genuinely valuable employee, HR should work with them more flexibly.

County Manager Fernando Macias would undoubtedly say he acts to preserve the County's funds and ethical rules. Some folks in other departments see some of his actions as “a power grab” and resent both the content and the manner of those actions.
I'm neutral, but I'd urge the County Commission to look at this and either figure out the rules or make some. Some rules seem familiar. For example, the elected official can name his or her chief deputy; but is that person's compensation fixed by the official, the county manager, the commission, or some combination? 

Where there are actual rules, let's publish them. Where there are unwritten rules, let's find out where they came from and decide whether or not to retain them. What kinds of contracts involving elected officials' departments must be blessed by the County Commission, and why? Should the Law Department's legal review of contracts be limited to changes that are clearly required by law or clear practical concerns? (The contract for Magistrate Court security is a great example of how things shouldn't work. Even two-year-olds – or cats – could have done better!) 

Finally, this process should involve the Law Department; but the discussion should also include questions to the Attorney General, where appropriate, and the commission should hear from other lawyers and former officials familiar with the problem. We need an open discussion – open to the public and open to creative ideas.
                                                    -30-

[The above column appeared this morning, Sunday. 8 September 2019, in the Las Cruces Sun-News, as well as on the newspaper's website and  KRWG's website.  A spoken version will air during the week both on KRWG and on KTAL, 101.5 FM (Las Cruces Community Radio), and will shortly be available on demand on KRWG's website.)]

["Should we continue to have elected county officials other than commissioners?" is a bootless question.  We have them under our state constitution.  Theoretically, they give the people more direct control over county government.  Whether or not these offices should be political popularity contests is a fair question, but not one that New Mexico is likely to examine seriously in the foreseeable future.
That very fact accentuates the need to figure out, as best we can, how to deal with the situation.  That won't necessarily be easy.  How do you write a rule or procedure that works both for a situation where a sheriff is saddled with a bad hire high up in the administration and has appointed a sheriff with substantial police experience and a clean record and for a situation where a sheriff has appointed a political hack or crony whom other local law enforcement laugh at?  We generally don't want commissioners or county manager dictating policy to other elected officials or telling them how to do the jobs; but we've had some ugly situations recently, ranging from Treasurer David Gutierrez remaining in his office despite admitted bad conduct and his own party's suggestion he should resign through Seeberger to Undersheriff Ken Roberts, whose questionable management skills and questionable conduct was fine with Sheriff Vigil for quite a long time.]

[One tends to think county government interference with elected officials should be minimal, but four years is a long time, and -- as we all saw with Gutierrez -- recall is dauntingly difficult.]

[By the way, speaking of local elections, we'll be doing a series of candidate fora on KTAL, 101.5 FM (www.lccommunityradio.org), starting this coming Wednesday, 11 September, with candidates for Las Cruces Public School Board Position 5 (8-9 a.m.) then Las Cruces City Council, District 1 (9-10 a.m.).
The full schedule is currently:
                                           8-9 a.m.                                               9-10 a.m.
11 Sep

L.C. School Board Pos. 5
Ed Frank
Carol Lynn Cooper 
Gloria J. Martinez 
Maria G. Pacheco
LC Councilor Pos. 1
Kasandra A. Gandara


Shelly A. Nichols-Shaw
496-4701 Shanntiles@gmail.co
18Sep

8-9 City Council District 2
Tessa Stuve
Philip Van Veen
Jason D. Estrada 
Jack L. Valencia, Jr.
Could run over into 9 hr. if more candidates join the race
Consider Constitution Day this hour or shortened for 18 Sept.
25Sep

8-9 City Council District 4
Johana Bencomo 
Robert Palacios
Antoinette Reyes
Could run over into 9 hr. if more candidates join the race
2 Oct

8-9:30
Las Cruces Mayoral Race
Bev Courtney 
Alexander Paige Baca Fresquez 
Jesusita Dolores Lucero 
William “Bill Mattiace
Ken Miyagashima 
Eugenia “Gina” Montoya Ortega
Jorge Sanchez
Gregory Z Smith
Isabella Solis
Mike Tellez 
8-9:30
Las Cruces Mayoral Race
[ could run past 9:30 with so many candidates! ]


9 Oct

LCPS Board Election – 4?
Jesus Joaquin Favela, Jr. 
[by pre-recording]
Margaret Montoya 
Jeffrey R. Silva 
Teresa Tenorio
Janice Marie Williams
William J Zarges 
DASWCD Supervisor 1
1 Kurt SJ Anderson
1 Jerry Guy Schickedanz
16Oct

Presiding Municipal Judge
Joy Goldbaum
Richard Jacquez
DASWCD
Supervisor 2
2 Fernando Clemente
2 David Joseph Martinez


Supervisor 5
5 Christopher Kost Podruchny Cardenas
5 Joshua L. Smith
23Oct





30Oct





6 Nov Post-election













No comments:

Post a Comment