The Doña
Ana County Commission needs to schedule a work session with other
elected officials – Sheriff, Clerk, Treasurer, and Assessor –
concerning a key problem.
A city's comptroller and police chief
aren't elected. The U.S. President appoints the FBI Director and
U.S. Treasurer, with the Senate's “advice and consent.” If you
and I were assigned to create an effective local government, we'd
likely not fill so many positions through elections.
Elected county officials are a vestige
of New Mexico history, for better or worse. That creates problems;
and problems, like carpets, need to be aired out now and then.
Beaten with a broom, maybe. Neither averting one's eyes nor
manipulating the ambiguities to grab power is helpful.
There are grey areas regarding how
county manager and elected officials work together. Voters elect a
clerk or treasurer or sheriff based on his or her reputation and
ideas; each enters office intent on doing a good job; but in certain
areas – notably human resources, purchasing, and the legal – the
elected official's power and discretion is limited. That naturally
creates conflicts.
How we view those conflicts can depend
on the elected official. Some who supported Kim Stewart's request
for a big raise for Undersheriff Jaime Quesada would have lost their
breakfasts on the commission-chamber carpet if Kiki Vigil had
obtained commission approval of a similar raise for Undersheriff Ken
Roberts. Kiki objected violently to county interference with his
personnel decisions; but what sane observer wasn't relieved that the
County managed to sack Sheriff Todd Garrison's pal, Rick Seeberger.
(Full disclosure: Seeberger sued everyone in sight, including me; the
U.S. District Court eventually took his money, not defendants'.)
Some of what goes on would be comical
if it didn't waste our money and our county government's energy. The
County needs to avoid paying gobs of our money to unqualified cronies
of elected officials; but maybe when officials need to retain a
genuinely valuable employee, HR should work with them more flexibly.
County Manager Fernando Macias would
undoubtedly say he acts to preserve the County's funds and ethical
rules. Some folks in other departments see some of his actions as “a
power grab” and resent both the content and the manner of those
actions.
I'm neutral, but I'd urge the County
Commission to look at this and either figure out the rules or make
some. Some rules seem familiar. For example, the elected official
can name his or her chief deputy; but is that person's compensation
fixed by the official, the county manager, the commission, or some
combination?
Where there are actual rules, let's
publish them. Where there are unwritten rules, let's find out where
they came from and decide whether or not to retain them. What kinds
of contracts involving elected officials' departments must be blessed
by the County Commission, and why? Should the Law Department's legal
review of contracts be limited to changes that are clearly required
by law or clear practical concerns? (The contract for Magistrate
Court security is a great example of how things shouldn't work. Even
two-year-olds – or cats – could have done better!)
Finally, this process should involve
the Law Department; but the discussion should also include questions
to the Attorney General, where appropriate, and the commission should
hear from other lawyers and former officials familiar with the
problem. We need an open discussion – open to the public and open
to creative ideas.
-30-
[The above column appeared this morning, Sunday. 8 September 2019, in the Las Cruces Sun-News, as well as on the newspaper's website and KRWG's website. A spoken version will air during the week both on KRWG and on KTAL, 101.5 FM (Las Cruces Community Radio), and will shortly be available on demand on KRWG's website.)]
["Should we continue to have elected county officials other than commissioners?" is a bootless question. We have them under our state constitution. Theoretically, they give the people more direct control over county government. Whether or not these offices should be political popularity contests is a fair question, but not one that New Mexico is likely to examine seriously in the foreseeable future.
That very fact accentuates the need to figure out, as best we can, how to deal with the situation. That won't necessarily be easy. How do you write a rule or procedure that works both for a situation where a sheriff is saddled with a bad hire high up in the administration and has appointed a sheriff with substantial police experience and a clean record and for a situation where a sheriff has appointed a political hack or crony whom other local law enforcement laugh at? We generally don't want commissioners or county manager dictating policy to other elected officials or telling them how to do the jobs; but we've had some ugly situations recently, ranging from Treasurer David Gutierrez remaining in his office despite admitted bad conduct and his own party's suggestion he should resign through Seeberger to Undersheriff Ken Roberts, whose questionable management skills and questionable conduct was fine with Sheriff Vigil for quite a long time.]
[One tends to think county government interference with elected officials should be minimal, but four years is a long time, and -- as we all saw with Gutierrez -- recall is dauntingly difficult.]
[By the way, speaking of local elections, we'll be doing a series of candidate fora on KTAL, 101.5 FM (www.lccommunityradio.org), starting this coming Wednesday, 11 September, with candidates for Las Cruces Public School Board Position 5 (8-9 a.m.) then Las Cruces City Council, District 1 (9-10 a.m.).
The full schedule is currently:
8-9 a.m. 9-10 a.m.
11 Sep |
L.C.
School Board Pos. 5
Ed
Frank
Carol
Lynn Cooper
Gloria
J. Martinez
Maria
G. Pacheco
|
LC
Councilor Pos. 1
Kasandra
A. Gandara
Shelly
A. Nichols-Shaw
496-4701
Shanntiles@gmail.co
|
|
18Sep | 8-9
City Council District 2 Tessa Stuve Philip Van Veen Jason D. Estrada Jack L. Valencia, Jr. |
Could
run over into 9 hr. if more candidates join the race Consider Constitution Day this hour or shortened for 18 Sept. |
|
25Sep | 8-9
City Council District 4
Johana
Bencomo
Robert
Palacios
Antoinette
Reyes
|
Could run over into 9 hr. if more candidates join the race | |
2 Oct | 8-9:30
Las
Cruces Mayoral Race
Bev
Courtney
Alexander
Paige Baca Fresquez
Jesusita
Dolores Lucero
William
“Bill Mattiace
Ken
Miyagashima
Eugenia
“Gina” Montoya Ortega
Jorge
Sanchez
Gregory
Z Smith
Isabella
Solis
Mike
Tellez
|
8-9:30
Las
Cruces Mayoral Race
[ could run past 9:30 with so many candidates! ]
|
|
9 Oct | LCPS
Board Election – 4? Jesus Joaquin Favela, Jr. [by pre-recording] Margaret Montoya Jeffrey R. Silva Teresa Tenorio
Janice
Marie Williams
William
J Zarges
|
DASWCD
Supervisor 1
1
Kurt SJ Anderson
1
Jerry Guy Schickedanz
|
|
16Oct | Presiding
Municipal Judge
Joy
Goldbaum
Richard
Jacquez
|
DASWCD Supervisor 2
2
Fernando Clemente
2
David Joseph Martinez
Supervisor 5
5
Christopher Kost Podruchny Cardenas
5
Joshua L. Smith
|
|
23Oct | |||
30Oct | |||
6 Nov | Post-election |
No comments:
Post a Comment