Recently
someone remarked that we can do little or nothing to affect what
happens. I agreed, but suggested that as long as we're here, why not
continue our foolish efforts?
2020
will bring elections with more than usual riding on the results.
Let's listen to candidates, and work hard for whomever we support.
BUT let's all recall that few of our political adversaries, if any,
are evil, or mean harm to us or our country. Almost all share our
wish to make the U.S. the best nation we can be. Sure, many haven't
researched things systematically, others are trapped in outmoded
beliefs or ideologies, and many are afraid; but they are not the
enemy.
Therefore
it's important to keep talking. And listening! Not giving up on
each other.
While
I no longer believe in Santa or God, I maintain a perhaps
anachronistic belief in democracy. I still believe in the free
exchange of ideas our country was founded on, the wisdom of the
common person, and the Maine town meeting notion that if we discuss
something honestly and vigorously, we'll eventually get it right.
But that requires us to investigate issues carefully and articulate
them, without getting unnecessarily personal.
Is
democracy endangered by our hyper-partisanship? By big money
tricking us into unwarranted faith in this shampoo or that political
candidate? By the retreat of the U.S. and Britain into faux
nationalist foolishness? By India and much of Europe falling into
ethnic prejudice? By the unarguable fact that our system placed
Donald Trump in the White House? You betcha! I hope we'll survive
and thrive; but would I bet money on it? Don't ask!
Complex
political issues aren't football games, where we root passionately
for the Aggies over UTEP, no matter what. We need to maintain our
fragile personal relationships with folks we don't always agree with.
At the Farmers Market, I enjoy Randy Harris's table because
progressives and Trumpists sit with each other, and pet each others'
dogs.
It'll
help if we can maintain our compassion and humor, avoid being
judgmental, and recognize (1) how much we have to be grateful for and
(2) how little each of us knows. Facing our own ignorance and asking
questions are two solid steps toward both professional success and
personal harmony. Our aversion to studying the facts, not just
reading the commentators we agree with, is certainly unhelpful. As
Benjamin Franklin replied to someone asking what the Constitutional
Convention had come up with: “We've given you a republic – if you
can keep it.”
Meanwhile,
let's celebrate what's great in our town. The Community of Hope is
wonderful, and its program to get homeless veterans into homes
unique. Our young people are wonderful and unique too: recent news
stories describe Alivea (10) serving homeless at El Caldito and
Lily's second-grade “Passion Project” inspiring southern New
Mexico Walmarts to donate tents and blankets to Camp Hope. (Both
come from families where giving and caring go back at least three
generations.)
These
young people remind us that many in Doña
Ana County are doing great things, often without much recognition.
If you know some, thank them!
Whatever
our beliefs, the Christmas Season provides a chance to pause and
reflect – to review the closing year and contemplate the coming
one. Let's continue the struggle, with a constant eye toward
improvement. We may not “succeed,” but we can sure do
less harm.
Happy
New Year!
-30-
[The above column appeared this morning, Sunday, 29 December 2019, in the Las Cruces Sun-News, as well as on the newspaper's website and KRWG's website. A spoken version will air during the week on KRWG and KTAL, 101.5 FM (www.lccommunityradio.org), and is also available at the KRWG site.]
[It'll take less than a minute, but I urge you to watch this award-winning Iranian short film.]
[The following local letter, reprinted from tpday's [29 December] Sun-News, comments on the huge political chasm between or among U.S. citizens:
'The Decline of Reason'
The
deep political divide in America is complex. A recent interview in The
Point magazine titled ‘Control Groups,’ helps significantly in trying to
understand. Tobias Haberkorn interviews William Davies, professor of
political economy, about his new book "Nervous States: Democracy and the
Decline of Reason."
Davies talks about factors
that have shaken our understanding of how things work. He indicates
traditional liberalism has assured us that “humans have a special,
ultimately God-given capacity to think autonomously, rationally and
reasonably,” and the Liberal State has been an agreement that the State
will handle defense/warfare so the people can “live in peace and
prosperity.” Davies clarifies the Liberal State does not guarantee
democracy, and that warfare is growing more and more pervasive,
including soldiers, and ‘information warfare,’ and drones.
Our
Liberal State and democracy are at risk. Davies emphasizes “a situation
of warfare is one in which nothing ever stays still for very long. You
have to be constantly on your guard … you need to be suspicious of
everything.” There is no time for “dispassionate objective studies.”
And, we are in Internet driven accelerated news and business cycles,
which value instant reaction and decisions over deliberation. Davies
also states “the language of entrepreneurship is riven with military
metaphors,” and that our current Populism/Nationalism movement has grown
primarily from defeat — the lowering life expectancy of white men, the
opiate crisis, fear of inadequate work, and the increasing feeling of
losing control.
Davies asserts “questions of suffering, disease and
mortality have re-entered the center of the political scene.” Democracy
seems too slow, whereas an authoritarian leader —Trump — promises to
help people regain control quicker. Disastrously, Trump is a con man,
only truly helping some, primarily the rich. If we believe in American
democracy, we best unite, restart critical thinking, and regain control.
John Funk, Santa Teresa ]
You call for "nonjudgmentalism," and the article is replete with egregious and strident judgmentalism.
ReplyDeleteWhich article are you referring to, Jim?
ReplyDeleteIf it's "The Decline of Reason" then I may partially agree. If it's the author's "Year-End Reflections" then I would strongly disagree.